1990 • Lancia
Delta
Lancia Delta 1.6 GT i.e. (90 Hp) 1990Overall Score42.5/100
1990 Lancia Delta vs 1990 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.3 CAT (55 Hp) 1990Overall Score42.25/100
WINNER
Lancia Delta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia DeltaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
LanciaMakeVolkswagen
DeltaModelPolo
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4+1Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Lancia DeltaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
10,3 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
0 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1272 cc
90 HPPower55 HP
0 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia DeltaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank42 lt
10 ltUrban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia DeltaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size155/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia DeltaSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
—Length3765 mm
—Width1570 mm
—Height1350 mm
1005 KgWeight780 Kg
—Wheelbase2335 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Lancia Delta and 1990 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…