1996 • Lancia
Delta
Lancia Delta 1.6 (836.AO) 1996Overall Score50.25/100
1996 Lancia Delta vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.7 TD (82 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Lancia Delta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia DeltaSpecificationMazda 323
LanciaMakeMazda
DeltaModel323
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Lancia DeltaSpecificationMazda 323
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1581 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
103 HPPower82 HP
144 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia DeltaSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia DeltaSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia DeltaSpecificationMazda 323
4011 mmLength4340 mm
1759 mmWidth1710 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1205 KgWeight1170 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Lancia Delta and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…