DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A3 vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeMitsubishi
A3ModelASX
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
224 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
170 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4238 mmLength4295 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1421 mmHeight1625 mm
1335 KgWeight1460 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A3 and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…