DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Audi A3 vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi A3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChevrolet
A3ModelCaptiva
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
214 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
4,7 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
205/55 R16Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4237 mmLength4679 mm
1777 mmWidth1868 mm
1421 mmHeight1756 mm
1355 KgWeight1903 kg
—Luggage capacity447 lt
2601 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Audi A3 and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…