DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Audi A3 vs 2015 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
A3ModelX-Bow
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors—

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,2 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
209 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
223 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4456 mmLength3738 mm
1796 mmWidth1915 mm
1416 mmHeight1202 mm
1270 KgWeight790 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Audi A3 and 2015 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…