DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Acura TL vs 2015 Holden UTE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura TL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura TLSpecificationHolden UTE
AcuraMakeHolden
TLModelUTE
2012Model year2015
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Acura TLSpecificationHolden UTE
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3500 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
280 HPPower245 HP
254 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura TLSpecificationHolden UTE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura TLSpecificationHolden UTE
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
P245/50 R17 98VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura TLSpecificationHolden UTE
4928 mmLength5055 mm
1880 mmWidth1899 mm
1452 mmHeight1497 mm
1690 KgWeight1697 Kg
2775 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Acura TL and 2015 Holden UTE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura TL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…