DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Lada 2131 vs 2000 Tata Estate Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Estate

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

36.5–37.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeTata
2131ModelEstate
1995Model year2000
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

22,0 s0–100 km/h44,1 s
135 km/hTop speed113 km/h
1790 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
82 HPPower68 HP
139 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/80 R16Tyre size195/70 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4240 mmLength4625 mm
1680 mmWidth1700 mm
1640 mmHeight1610 mm
1370 KgWeight1640 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Lada 2131 and 2000 Tata Estate approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Estate leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…