DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lada 2120 Nadezhda vs 2000 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2120 Nadezhda

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeNissan
2120 NadezhdaModelAlmera
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h16,8 s
140 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1774 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
79 HPPower75 HP
131 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/80 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4320 mm
1725 mmWidth1690 mm
1690 mmHeight1365 mm
1400 KgWeight1220 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lada 2120 Nadezhda and 2000 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2120 Nadezhda leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…