DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lada 2115 vs 2004 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2115

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeNissan
2115ModelMicra
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

13,2 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
165 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
76 HPPower65 HP
102 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4330 mmLength3715 mm
1620 mmWidth1660 mm
1415 mmHeight1525 mm
970 KgWeight980 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lada 2115 and 2004 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2115 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…