1997 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.25/100
1997 Audi A3 vs 1997 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1997Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A3ModelFTO
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
3Doors2
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
110 HPPower126 HP
235 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption17,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4152 mmLength4320 mm
1735 mmWidth1735 mm
1427 mmHeight1300 mm
1180 KgWeight1100 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Audi A3 and 1997 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…