DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Lada 2109 vs 2003 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeNissan
2109ModelMicra
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h—
156 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1460 cc
70 HPPower82 HP
1064 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank46 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size175/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4205 mmLength3715 mm
1650 mmWidth1660 mm
1402 mmHeight1525 mm
970 KgWeight1025 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Lada 2109 and 2003 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…