DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Lada 2109 vs 1991 Mazda Cronos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Cronos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeMazda
2109ModelCronos
1991Model year1991
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h—
156 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
70 HPPower82 HP
1064 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
43 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size195/65 R14 89 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4205 mmLength4695 mm
1650 mmWidth1770 mm
1402 mmHeight1400 mm
970 KgWeight1260 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Lada 2109 and 1991 Mazda Cronos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Cronos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…