DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lada 2109 vs 1999 Daihatsu Charade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2109

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeDaihatsu
2109ModelCharade
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
156 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
72 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size155/80 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4006 mmLength4085 mm
1650 mmWidth1620 mm
1402 mmHeight1390 mm
945 KgWeight885 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2395 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lada 2109 and 1999 Daihatsu Charade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2109 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…