E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lada 2108 vs 2003 Ford Tourneo Connect Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2108

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

63.75–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lada 2108SpecificationFord Tourneo Connect
LadaMakeFord
2108ModelTourneo Connect
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Lada 2108SpecificationFord Tourneo Connect
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
70 HPPower115 HP
1064 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lada 2108SpecificationFord Tourneo Connect
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lada 2108SpecificationFord Tourneo Connect
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

Lada 2108SpecificationFord Tourneo Connect
—Length4278 mm
—Width1795 mm
—Height1814 mm
—Weight1425 Kg
—Wheelbase2664 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lada 2108 and 2003 Ford Tourneo Connect approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2108 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2003 Audi A2VS2003 Lada 2108Audi A2 vs Lada 21082003 and 2003 model years2003 Ford Tourneo ConnectVS2003 Lada 2108Ford Tourneo Connect vs Lada 21082003 and 2003 model years2003 Toyota MatrixVS2003 Lada 2108Toyota Matrix vs Lada 21082003 and 2003 model years2003 Nissan SentraVS2003 Lada 2108Nissan Sentra vs Lada 21082003 and 2003 model years2003 Toyota OpaVS2003 Lada 2108Toyota Opa vs Lada 21082003 and 2003 model years

Comments are loading…