DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Lada 2108 vs 1992 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

49.75–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lada 2108SpecificationRover 200
LadaMakeRover
2108Model200
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Lada 2108SpecificationRover 200
18,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
140 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1100 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
54 HPPower103 HP
779 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lada 2108SpecificationRover 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lada 2108SpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 SR13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lada 2108SpecificationRover 200
4006 mmLength4220 mm
1650 mmWidth1680 mm
1402 mmHeight1390 mm
900 KgWeight1065 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Lada 2108 and 1992 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…