DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Lada 2107 vs 2002 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lada 2107SpecificationNissan AD
LadaMakeNissan
2107ModelAD
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Lada 2107SpecificationNissan AD
155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1690 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
80 HPPower105 HP
128 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lada 2107SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Lada 2107SpecificationNissan AD
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/70 SR13Tyre size—

Dimensions

Lada 2107SpecificationNissan AD
4128 mmLength4370 mm
1620 mmWidth1695 mm
1435 mmHeight1475 mm
1030 KgWeight1130 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Lada 2107 and 2002 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…