DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo C70
AudiMakeVolvo
A3ModelC70
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo C70
7,6 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
228 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower225 HP
235 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption16,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo C70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo C70
4152 mmLength4720 mm
1735 mmWidth1820 mm
1427 mmHeight1410 mm
1180 KgWeight1570 Kg
2513 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…