DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Lada 2106 vs 1992 Lancia Delta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeLancia
2106ModelDelta
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
155 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
116 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank59 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption10 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,1 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size—

Dimensions

4116 mmLength—
1611 mmWidth—
1440 mmHeight—
1050 KgWeight1005 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Lada 2106 and 1992 Lancia Delta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…