DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lada 2106 vs 2005 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lada 2106

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeVolkswagen
2106ModelCaddy
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h17,9 s
150 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
116 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4166 mmLength4405 mm
1611 mmWidth1802 mm
1440 mmHeight1833 mm
1035 KgWeight1446-1567 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2682 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lada 2106 and 2005 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lada 2106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…