2004 • Lada
2106
Lada 2106 1.6 (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score43.25/100
2004 Lada 2106 vs 2009 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 CDTI (65 Hp) 2009Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Lada 2106
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lada 2106SpecificationOpel Combo
LadaMakeOpel
2106ModelCombo
2004Model year2009
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Lada 2106SpecificationOpel Combo
17,5 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
150 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
75 HPPower65 HP
116 NmTorque130 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lada 2106SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lada 2106SpecificationOpel Combo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Lada 2106SpecificationOpel Combo
4166 mmLength4322 mm
1611 mmWidth1684 mm
1440 mmHeight1801 mm
1035 KgWeight1205 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2716 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Lada 2106 and 2009 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lada 2106 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…