2003 • Lada
2106
Lada 2106 1.6 (75 Hp) 2003Overall Score43.25/100
2003 Lada 2106 vs 2003 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2003Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lada 2106SpecificationKia Retona
LadaMakeKia
2106ModelRetona
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Lada 2106SpecificationKia Retona
17,5 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
150 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
75 HPPower87 HP
116 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lada 2106SpecificationKia Retona
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
39 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lada 2106SpecificationKia Retona
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Lada 2106SpecificationKia Retona
4166 mmLength4000 mm
1611 mmWidth1745 mm
1440 mmHeight1835 mm
1035 KgWeight1505 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Lada 2106 and 2003 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…