DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lada 2106 vs 1996 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lada 2106SpecificationRenault 19
LadaMakeRenault
2106Model19
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lada 2106SpecificationRenault 19
17,5 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
116 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lada 2106SpecificationRenault 19
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lada 2106SpecificationRenault 19
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 SR13Tyre size175/65 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lada 2106SpecificationRenault 19
4166 mmLength4248 mm
1611 mmWidth1696 mm
1440 mmHeight1412 mm
1035 KgWeight1045 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lada 2106 and 1996 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…