DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Lada 2106 vs 1990 Rover Mini MK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeRover
2106ModelMini MK
1988Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

17,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
150 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1275 cc
75 HPPower61 HP
116 NmTorque91 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank34 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
175/70 SR13Tyre size145/70 R12

Dimensions

4166 mmLength3050 mm
1611 mmWidth1410 mm
1440 mmHeight1350 mm
1035 KgWeight695 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2035 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Lada 2106 and 1990 Rover Mini MK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…