DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi A3 vs 1996 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo 960
AudiMakeVolvo
A3Model960
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo 960
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
217 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
150 HPPower190 HP
210 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption15 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo 960
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo 960
4152 mmLength4871 mm
1735 mmWidth1750 mm
1427 mmHeight1411 mm
1145 KgWeight—
2513 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi A3 and 1996 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…