DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2017 Audi TT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
KTMMakeAudi
X-BowModelTT
2016Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeCoupe
2Seats2+2
—Doors2

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
3,9 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower220 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 S tronic
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size245/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi TT
3738 mmLength4184 mm
1915 mmWidth1832 mm
1202 mmHeight1353 mm
790 KgWeight1435 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2017 Audi TT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…