DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2016 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A3
KTMMakeAudi
X-BowModelA3
2016Model year2016
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A3
3,9 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
220 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower223 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A3
3738 mmLength4456 mm
1915 mmWidth1796 mm
1202 mmHeight1416 mm
790 KgWeight1270 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2016 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…