DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2015 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11.75 points.

81.75–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAlpina B3
KTMMakeAlpina
X-BowModelB3
2016Model year2015
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAlpina B3
3,9 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
220 km/hTop speed298 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
240 HPPower410 HP
310 NmTorque600 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8 Switch-Tronic
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAlpina B3
3738 mmLength4632 mm
1915 mmWidth1811 mm
1202 mmHeight1431 mm
790 KgWeight1705 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2015 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…