DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 KTM X-Bow vs 2012 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A6
KTMMakeAudi
X-BowModelA6
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A6
3,9 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
220 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower211 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
40 ltFuel tank73 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A6
3738 mmLength4915 mm
1915 mmWidth1874 mm
1202 mmHeight1468 mm
790 KgWeight1770 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2912 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 KTM X-Bow and 2012 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…