DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 KTM X-Bow vs 2012 Mazda CX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda CX-7
KTMMakeMazda
X-BowModelCX-7
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda CX-7
3,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed211 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
240 HPPower260 HP
310 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda CX-7
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank69 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda CX-7
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size235/55 R19
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationMazda CX-7
3738 mmLength4700 mm
1915 mmWidth1870 mm
1202 mmHeight1645 mm
790 KgWeight1740 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 KTM X-Bow and 2012 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…