DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 KTM X-Bow vs 2012 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A4
KTMMakeAudi
X-BowModelA4
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A4
3,9 s0–100 km/h7,0 s
220 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower214 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsMultitronic
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationAudi A4
3738 mmLength4701 mm
1915 mmWidth1826 mm
1202 mmHeight1427 mm
790 KgWeight1590 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2808 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 KTM X-Bow and 2012 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…