DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 KTM X-Bow vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTMMakeLand Rover
X-BowModelRange Rover Evoque
2012Model year2012
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

3,9 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
220 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
240 HPPower240 HP
310 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3738 mmLength4355 mm
1915 mmWidth1965 mm
1202 mmHeight1635 mm
790 KgWeight1670 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 KTM X-Bow and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…