DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 KTM X-Bow vs 2009 Opel GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationOpel GT
KTMMakeOpel
X-BowModelGT
2009Model year2009
RoadsterBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
—Doors2

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationOpel GT
3,9 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
220 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
240 HPPower264 HP
310 NmTorque353 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationOpel GT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationOpel GT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationOpel GT
3738 mmLength4100 mm
1915 mmWidth1813 mm
1202 mmHeight1274 mm
790 KgWeight1406 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2415 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 KTM X-Bow and 2009 Opel GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…