DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Audi A3 vs 2013 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Rapid

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
AudiMakeSkoda
A3ModelRapid
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
195 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
105 HPPower122 HP
250 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7
205/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R14; 185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationSkoda Rapid
4237 mmLength4483 mm
1777 mmWidth1706 mm
1421 mmHeight1461 mm
1230 KgWeight1230 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Audi A3 and 2013 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…