2004 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.6 (102 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
2004 Audi A3 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.5i (105 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Lancer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A3ModelLancer
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
12,2 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1468 cc
102 HPPower105 HP
148 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4286 mmLength—
1765 mmWidth—
1423 mmHeight—
1320 KgWeight—
2578 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Audi A3 and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…