DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A3 vs 2012 Volkswagen Eos Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Eos

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolkswagen
A3ModelEos
2012Model year2012
CabrioletBody typeCoupe - Cabriolet
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
200 km/hTop speed217 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
125 HPPower160 HP
200 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R16; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4238 mmLength4423 mm
1765 mmWidth1791 mm
1424 mmHeight1444 mm
1410 KgWeight1526 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A3 and 2012 Volkswagen Eos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Eos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…