2012 • Audi
A3
Audi A3 1.4 TFSI (122 Hp) 2012Overall Score70.5/100
2012 Audi A3 vs 2013 Chevrolet Trax Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Chevrolet
Trax
Chevrolet Trax LS 2013 1.4T 140 HPOverall Score70.25/100
WINNER
Audi A3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.5–70.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A3SpecificationChevrolet Trax
AudiMakeChevrolet
A3ModelTrax
2012Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Audi A3SpecificationChevrolet Trax
9,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
203 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
122 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A3SpecificationChevrolet Trax
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A3SpecificationChevrolet Trax
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A3SpecificationChevrolet Trax
4237 mmLength4248 mm
1777 mmWidth1776 mm
1421 mmHeight1647 mm
1175 KgWeight1319 kg
—Luggage capacity356 lt
2601 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Audi A3 and 2013 Chevrolet Trax approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi A3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…