DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Shuma vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeAlfa Romeo
ShumaModel156
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1793 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
152 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R14Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4525 mmLength4430 mm
1720 mmWidth1745 mm
1415 mmHeight1415 mm
1135 KgWeight1230 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Shuma and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…