DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Shuma vs 2000 Volkswagen Sharan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolkswagen
ShumaModelSharan
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
196 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1793 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
152 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4620 mm
1711 mmWidth1810 mm
1427 mmHeight1730 mm
1140 KgWeight1665 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Shuma and 2000 Volkswagen Sharan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…