DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Kia Shuma vs 2001 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Shuma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeCitroen
ShumaModelXsara
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
180 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
88 HPPower68 HP
135 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4167 mm
1711 mmWidth1698 mm
1427 mmHeight1405 mm
1100 KgWeight1120 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Kia Shuma and 2001 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Shuma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…