DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Kia Rio vs 2011 Nissan Pixo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pixo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RioSpecificationNissan Pixo
KiaMakeNissan
RioModelPixo
2011Model year2011
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

Kia RioSpecificationNissan Pixo
16,1 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
160 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1120 ccEngine displacement996 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
170 NmTorque90 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RioSpecificationNissan Pixo
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RioSpecificationNissan Pixo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17Tyre size55/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia RioSpecificationNissan Pixo
4045 mmLength3565 mm
1720 mmWidth1600 mm
1455 mmHeight1470 mm
1116 KgWeight885 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Kia Rio and 2011 Nissan Pixo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pixo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…