DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Kia Retona vs 2001 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
KiaMakeMazda
RetonaModel323
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
15,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
150 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
128 HPPower90 HP
175 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
4000 mmLength4200 mm
1745 mmWidth1705 mm
1845 mmHeight1410 mm
1480 KgWeight1175 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Kia Retona and 2001 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…