DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSeat
RetonaModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

15,0 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
150 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
128 HPPower110 HP
175 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4000 mmLength4617 mm
1745 mmWidth1810 mm
1845 mmHeight1728 mm
1480 KgWeight1754 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…