2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 i 16V (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Honda
Sm-x
Honda Sm-x 2.0 i 16V (131 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
KiaMakeHonda
RetonaModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3Doors4
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
15,0 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
128 HPPower131 HP
175 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,93 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,43 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationHonda Sm-x
4000 mmLength3950 mm
1745 mmWidth1695 mm
1845 mmHeight1750 mm
1480 KgWeight1330 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…