2003 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2003Overall Score43.5/100
2003 Kia Retona vs 2003 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.5 D (57 Hp) 2003Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen Saxo
KiaMakeCitroen
RetonaModelSaxo
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen Saxo
20,5 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
120 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
87 HPPower57 HP
200 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen Saxo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen Saxo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen Saxo
4000 mmLength3718 mm
1745 mmWidth1595 mm
1835 mmHeight1368 mm
1505 KgWeight890 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Retona and 2003 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…