DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Kia Retona vs 2002 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RetonaSpecificationLada 2106
KiaMakeLada
RetonaModel2106
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Kia RetonaSpecificationLada 2106
20,5 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
120 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1569 cc
87 HPPower75 HP
200 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RetonaSpecificationLada 2106
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank39 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RetonaSpecificationLada 2106
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/75 R15Tyre size175/70 SR13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Kia RetonaSpecificationLada 2106
4000 mmLength4166 mm
1745 mmWidth1611 mm
1835 mmHeight1440 mm
1505 KgWeight1035 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Kia Retona and 2002 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…