1997 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 1997Overall Score42.5/100
1997 Kia Retona vs 1993 Citroen BX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Citroen
BX
Citroen BX 1.9 D (71 Hp) 1993Overall Score42.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen BX
KiaMakeCitroen
RetonaModelBX
1997Model year1993
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen BX
20,5 s0–100 km/h19,1 s
120 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
87 HPPower71 HP
200 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen BX
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationCitroen BX
4000 mmLength4237 mm
1745 mmWidth1682 mm
1835 mmHeight1370 mm
1505 KgWeight1135 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2655 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Kia Retona and 1993 Citroen BX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…