DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A2 vs 2000 AC ACE Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC ACE

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 30.25 points.

52.25–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A2SpecificationAC ACE
AudiMakeAC
A2ModelACE
2003Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Audi A2SpecificationAC ACE
12,3 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
173 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement3506 cc
75 HPPower354 HP
126 NmTorque407 Nm
4Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A2SpecificationAC ACE
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank90 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption20 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A2SpecificationAC ACE
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/60 R15Tyre size245/40 ZR18; 255/45 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A2SpecificationAC ACE
3826 mmLength4420 mm
1673 mmWidth1870 mm
1553 mmHeight1300 mm
995 KgWeight1510 Kg
2405 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A2 and 2000 AC ACE approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC ACE leads the E-Kıyasla score by 30.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…