DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Kia Pro Cee'd vs 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Pro Cee'd

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeAlfa Romeo
Pro Cee'dModelMiTo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors2/3

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
135 HPPower120 HP
164 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4310 mmLength4060 mm
1780 mmWidth1720 mm
1430 mmHeight1440 mm
1369 KgWeight1205 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Kia Pro Cee'd and 2013 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Pro Cee'd leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…