DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Pro Cee'd vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Pro Cee'd

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFiat
Pro Cee'dModelBravo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
192 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1591 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
126 HPPower90 HP
154 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/65 R15; 195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4250 mmLength4336 mm
1790 mmWidth1792 mm
1450 mmHeight1498 mm
1257 KgWeight1320 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Pro Cee'd and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Pro Cee'd leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…