DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Audi A2 vs 2004 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A2SpecificationNissan Micra
AudiMakeNissan
A2ModelMicra
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Audi A2SpecificationNissan Micra
10,9 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1460 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
230 NmTorque185 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A2SpecificationNissan Micra
DieselFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A2SpecificationNissan Micra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A2SpecificationNissan Micra
3826 mmLength3715 mm
1673 mmWidth1660 mm
1553 mmHeight1525 mm
1105 KgWeight1025 Kg
2405 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Audi A2 and 2004 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…